Privacy Blog

Blogging Privacy and Security

Recent Posts

  • Hushmail.com hijacked, Network Solutions security breech?
  • Network Solutions breeched? Hushmail phished on April 23, 2005
  • AIM privacy - AOL instant messenger privacy
  • Choicepoint stops selling consumer social security number market?
  • Anonimizer Privacy Notes
  • More on email privacy and the Panix hijacking
  • George Mason University Hacked
  • Academic Personal Information Hacks
  • Blackberry Privacy: PIN messaging not private
  • Restroom Privacy - Not?

Privacy Threats

  • Firewall Software Reviews
  • GPS tracking
  • email privacy
  • Social Security Numbers Stolen
  • Webcam hacks
  • Gmail and Privacy

Categories

  • Current Affairs

Internet Cookies

Adware and Malware

Internet Privacy Organizations

Internet Privacy Consultants

Privacy and Security News

  • OnStar and Privacy

Child Safety

Private Proxy Services

Computer Virus

Spyware

Anonymized Access

  • Open Proxies

Courts OK police use of GPS trackers without Oversight

According to a report on c-net.com, law enforcement is able to secretly attach hidden GPS recorders to your car without your knowledge or a court order. That's right, they are able to record where you go and when, down to what, 9 feet accuracy these days? And most importantly, that is without a court order, so in other words, they can do it "just to see what we can find out".

...the officers did not pry into a hidden or enclosed area...

According to the reporter /researcher declan.mccullagh@cnet.com, prior court rulings (1,2 cited) have determined that the undercarriage of your car is not a "hidden or enclosed area" and therefore investigators (or others?) can put a tracking device there without it being a privacy invasion. That time there was a warrant obtained (the police had to get a judge's permission before placing the tracking device, and the judge would have required them to show some reasonable suspicion that you were involved in a crime). This time, it is ruled to be permissable even without a search warrant. Not this time.

The Times Union also reported:

In a decision that could dramatically affect criminal investigations nationwide, a federal judge has ruled police didn't need a warrant when they attached a satellite tracking device to the underbelly of a car being driven by a suspected Hells Angels operative.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd clears the way for a federal trial scheduled to begin next month in Utica in which seven alleged Hells Angels members and associates, including several from the Capital Region, face drug-trafficking charges.

According to reports, the judge ruled that:

"While the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures...it doesn't apply where there is no legitimate expectation of privacy... and Moran had no expectation of privacy in the whereabouts of his vehicle on a public roadway."

January 14, 2005 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

« Previous

Archives

  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005

Recent Comments

Privacy Websites

  • Privacy Desk
  • Privacy Desk's Privacy Blog